The numbers are out on how much energy the country used in 2009: less than we did in 2008. This isn’t surprising given the economic situation.
We’re also using more renewable energy, particularly wind power. This isn’t surprising either, given the growth in the wind energy sector in recent years and the stimulus funding.
The numbers, from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, show the same trends as last year.
Energy efficiency has also stayed consistent. The US lost 58% of the energy it generated in 2009 and 57.5% in 2008. Transportation energy losses were 75% and electricity sector losses were 68% in both years.
However, look a few years further back and you’ll see that our national energy efficiency is declining. The US lost 56% of the energy it generated in 2006. Transportation losses were 71% and electricity sector losses were 65%.
I combined the 2006 categories cars, freight and aviation into the equivalent of the 2008 and 2009 transportation category, so there could be a discrepancy there. But as far as I can tell there haven’t been any methodology changes.
So what’s the story? A couple of percentage points might not seem like a lot, but it represents a huge amount of energy. That’s about 2 quadrillion BTUs, which is nearly double the combined amount of wind, solar and geothermal energy the US generated last year. More importantly, it shows we’re moving in the wrong direction.
If anyone has an explanation or more details, let me know.
UPDATE 8-31-2010
Turns out there are some changes in how the numbers were derived from 2006 to 2008 and 2009, particularly the electricity generation numbers, according to A.J. Simon, an Energy Systems Analyst at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
But the main reason for the apparent drop in efficiency is a shift in where we spend our energy.
“The slight decline in efficiency that you calculated is due to the slowly changing distribution away from the industrial sector and towards transportation,” said Simon.
This helps put in perspective the importance of efficient transportation.