Archive for March, 2010

Fine-grained predictions

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010

A US government program to develop better tools for predicting climate change aims to reduce the uncertainty of how global warming will change the planet.

Decadal and Regional Climate Prediction Using Earth System Models (EaSM), a joint program of the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy and the Department of Agriculture, aims to foster climate models that work on finer geographical and time scales than today’s models.

The government’s announcement stresses expected impacts:

The consequences of climate change are becoming more immediate and profound than anticipated. These consequences include prolonged droughts, increased ecosystem stress, reduced agriculture and forest productivity, altered biological feedbacks, degraded ocean and permafrost habitats and the rapid retreat of glaciers and sea ice — all of which are expected to have major impacts on ecological, economic and social systems as well as on human health.

The models developed with the program’s support promise to aid climate change adaptation:

…planning for the management of food and water supplies, infrastructure construction, ecosystem maintenance, and other pressing societal issues at more localized levels and more immediate time periods…

Metaphorically speaking, this is about battening down the hatches. There was no mention of using the models to better predict what will happen depending on how successfully we curb carbon emissions. Even though climate change adaptation is the program’s focus, it would have been nice to see mitigation or emissions at least mentioned.

No doubt the models will be useful for gauging climate change mitigation efforts, particularly for regional impacts, whatever the stated purpose. And no doubt we’ll need all the help we can get to adapt to the consequences of the changes that are “baked into the system.”

On a related note, Rob Day’s most recent Cleantech Investing blog post gives a snapshot of climate and energy legislation after his visit to DC.

Another methane timebomb?

Friday, March 5th, 2010

Turns out that the Siberian permafrost many of us have been keeping a wary eye on is not the only potential climate timebomb.

There’s also permafrost under the Arctic Ocean, and it’s leaking methane into the atmosphere at an alarming rate. According to a paper in the journal Science, the Eastern Siberian Arctic Shelf is emitting as much methane as previous methane emissions estimates for all of the worlds oceans. The key question is whether the methane is seeping out gradually or is poised for a major meltdown.

Methane accounts for less than 10 percent of the climate impact of greenhouse gases. It’s about 20 times more potent than carbon dioxide, however. A little goes a long way toward producing a runaway positive feedback loop.

Gore gives us another shot

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

Al Gore’s inconvenient reminder in the New York Times left me as depressed as ever about our ability nationally and globally to deal with global warming. He updated the ever-infuriating story of self-interested obstructionism, and pointed out some of the fundamental aspects of the global economy that work against international cooperation (let alone consensus).

The piece was a call to arms, but also pointed out the daunting challenge: “The pathway to success is still open, though it tracks the outer boundary of what we are capable of doing.”

Gore’s concluding call for us to hold politicians accountable begs a couple of questions: do we have the will to do so, and if we do, will our political system let us?